Monday 22 October 2012

Booze, Sex and Violence


How does Daniel Craig's James Bond stack up against Pierce Brosnan's? Or Roger Moore's? Or Mr. Connery's? Who is the best Bond?



From The Economist

Note: in the new Bond, 'Skyfall', Heineken has paid in order make sure that Bond only drinks beer this time...

Bullish Strategy, With A Twist (Buy a Put)

If you are bullish on a given underlying, you probably think about buying a naked call. However, sometimes, the only option available to buy is a put. Should you buy it? Short answer: YES.

However, to replicate the call payoff, you actually need to delta hedge the put and then buy even more shares, to an amount equivalent to 100 delta... Which means that if you buy 1000 puts, then you buy 1000 shares.

To illustrate: If the call you wanted to buy initially has a 40 delta, then put at the same strike will have a 60 delta (put/call parity...) To equate the 40 delta of the call, then buy 40 delta more worth of shares... As simple as that.

Then, once the position is in place, if the the combination of put + shares will replicate a position on the naked call:
- when the underlying moves higher
     - the put delta value will decrease, as well as the delta of the option (at a decreasing rate)
     - the long shares position will gain in value
- when the underlying moves lower
     - the put value will increase, as well as the delta 
     - the long shares position will lose money

The greeks profile in terms of gamma, theta and volatility will be the same.
Differences will arise if the option is american and there are dividends as the put is never exercised, while a deeply in the money call will be exercised before the dividend ex-date.

Below, using a Black Sholes pricer, comparison between the values of a 3month 50 naked call with a 50 spot price, volatility = 25% and an equivalent put, over-hedge (according to the description above) with respect to spot price changes.

And voila, under your eyes, you can see that we have a replicating portfolio.



Wednesday 12 September 2012

Impact of Quantitative Easing - US vs Europe

I found interesting to compare the impact of Quantitative Easing / Operation Twist / Bailout / EFSF / SMP / Mario Draghi's Bazooka on the Equity Markets, in US and Europe on a timeline. 

In the US, the market is very responsive to QE. As a consequence, the S&P Index is back to April 08 level. In Europe, well ... I am still trying to find a pattern. It looks like a mess to me. Good news is bad news, but sometimes not, while bad news is bad news but sometimes good. And vice-versa... Something like that.




Saturday 8 September 2012

Steepness in the Forward Volatility Term Structure

I was looking at the steepness in the forward implied volatility and found something interesting. Currently, in the wonderful VIX world, the 1 month forward volatility term structure is the steepest ever (99th percentile) over the last 7 years, when looking at the difference between the 7 month and 4 month forward contracts (UX7 Index and UX4 Index in Bloomberg). The difference is 4 vols.



The trade here, is to sell the 7 month and to buy the 4 month contract in order to benefit from the convergence between the two volatilities. So the position is paying decay. In order to figure out how much decay the position is inflicting, I had a look at the 1 month / 3 month contracts spread in order to assess the cost of carry. The difference is 5 vols, which means that, provided we hold the position until maturity, the cost of holding the spread is 1 vol.


Looking at the risk/reward, I believe that the maximum steepness between the two contracts will be 5 to 6 vols (losing 1 to 2), while the possible gain is of 4 to 6 vols. the risk/reward ratio seems appealing, while the cost of carrying the positing is one of the smallest since 2005.

Why is the forward term structure so steep? 

I think that at the moment, we are in a world of financial repression where equity and bond markets are wherever central banks want them to be. The greater the level of monetary expansion, the calmer the VIX and the higher the gains in the S&P Index.

So, as realised volatility is poor and the equity market is rallying, implied volatilities are drifting lower and lower (even to truly absurd levels given the state of our economies), especially in the front end of the term structure. However, market participants still expect volatility to pick up in the future. 

So in a certain way, we go back to the same question, which is how long our politicians and central bankers can kick the can down the road and avoid confronting the real issues.

Monday 3 September 2012

Yeeehaaa! Let's Save The Euro, The World and The Princess!


Bearish Trading Strategy - with a twist





If you are bearish on an underlying, on low implied volatility names, you can:
-        Buy a naked put spread
-        Buy a put (hedged)
-        Buy an upside call (hedged)

Let's talk about the last trading strategy. It sounds counterintuitive, however, let's have a closer look. 

The interesting part is that, on a low implied volatility / high convexity underlying, the return is higher than on a hedged long put. See the detailed analysis below, for an instantaneous 5% down move.

Notes:
-         As the spot moves down by 5%, implied volatility follows the skew and is readjusted. Lets imagine (and this is purely fictive) that implied volatility moves up by 1% (fixed strike). Also, as we move away from our call, its implied volatility increases more (convexity). So we considered that for the call, the adjustment is 2 vols (This is an rough estimate - no science behind)
-        Being long the call, we end up with 9% delta, so we are still a bit short shares. Being long the put creates a larger delta position, so we are more and more long shares of a crashing underlying.
-        The highest performance is from the put spread strategy, we left it as a benchmark.

Greece Exit Contingency Plans On The Way ...

While in Europe we are still quite casual about Greece leaving the Eurozone, talking about it as a possible outcome without putting numbers on it (probably no one knows how broad the shock waves will be - think about the Lehman bankruptcy), American banks and consulting firms are advising their corporate clients on how to prepare for a splintering of the euro zone, something that was once unthinkable.

- Bank of America Merrill Lynch has looked into filling trucks with cash and sending them over the Greek border so clients can continue to pay local employees and suppliers in the event money is unavailable.
- Ford has configured its computer systems so they will be able to immediately handle a new Greek currency.
- JPMorgan Chase has already created new accounts for a handful of American companies that are reserved for a new drachma in Greece (or whatever currency)

Almost all of that has come in the last 90 days..
In a survey this summer, 80% of clients of an American consulting firm polled expected Greece to leave the euro zone, and a fifth of those expected more countries to follow. This morning, a FT poll found that 25% of Germans think Greece should stay in the Eurozone or get more help from other countries in the currency union.

Clearly, banks and consulting firms are making money from the fear of the Euro break-up. So should we be sceptical? Or start running around the house like mad?
On Thursday, the European Central Bank will consider measures that would ease pressure on Europe's cash-starved countries...

Just below, you can find the calendar of events for the Euro-zone.

Thursday 30 August 2012

European Calendar of Events



31 August:                 Jackson Hole
3 September:             Eurozone finance ministers meeting
6 September:             ECB governing council
11 September:           Bundestag returns from summer recess
12 September:           German constitutional court ruling on ESM and the fiscal compact
12 September:           Netherlands general election
Mid-September:         Troika report on Greece
14 September:           Eurozone finance ministers meeting
14-15 September:     ECOFIN
22 September:           Hollande/Merkel bilateral
26 September:           French draft budget for 2013 to parliament
4 October:                  ECB governing council
8 October:                  Eurozone finance ministers meeting (Review of Troika report on Greece)
9 October:                  ECOFIN
12-14 October:           IMF annual meeting (in Tokyo)
18-19 October:           EU summit
19-20 October:           CSU party convention
4-5 November:           G20 finance ministers (in Mexico)
8 November:              ECB governing council
12 November:             Eurozone finance ministers meeting
13 November:             ECOFIN
3 December:               Eurozone finance ministers meeting
3-5 December:            CDU party convention
4 December:              ECOFIN
13-14 December:       European Council
20 January 2013:      Lower Saxony regional election

Monday 27 August 2012

Equity Volatility Skew


Equity Volatility Skew

Equity Volatility Skew, sometimes called strike skew, is the measure of the disparity of option implied volatility for option contracts with different strikes but the same expiration. It is the extrapolated tangent between two given strikes implied volatility, and thus a slope.
                                                                                        
In equities, most of the time, it has a negative slope and is expressed by moneyness as the arithmetic difference between implied volatility of the 90% put option and the implied volatility of the 110% call option. It can also be expressed by strike (sticky strike, vol by constant strikes) or by delta (sticky delta, vol by delta constant).

Source: Bloomberg

Skew and Black Scholes

Existence of Strike skew is not predicted by the Black-Scholes model. Black Scholes model assumes that volatility is a property of the underlying instrument, so the same implied volatility value should be observed across all options on the same instrument.

Equity volatility skew is a consequence of empirical violations of the black Sholes stock prices return distribution assumptions. Indeed, the Black-Scholes model assumes that stock prices are lognormally distributed, which in turn implies that stock log-prices are normally distributed.


Reasons for a Skew

Empirical: Market returns are more leptokurtic than assumed in by the lognormal distribution. Market leptokurtosis would make way out-of-the-money or way in-the-money options more expensive than would be assumed by the Black-Scholes formulation. So by increasing prices for such options (and thus implied volatility), existence of implied volatility skew is a way of achieving higher prices than within the Black-Scholes model.

Statistical: Markets tend to fall harder than they rise and skewness is a measure of the asymmetry of the distribution. Being the 3rd standardized moment and representing this asymmetry, skewness expresses in a certain way the observed correlation between the move of a random process and its volatility (on this - to assess the risk neutral distribution asymmetry implied by an option, a theoretical framework or model is needed)

Behavourial: Volatility skew could reflect investors fear of market crashes, as deeply out of the money puts are a form of insurance against market crashes. As they are considered as low cost in terms of dollars, deeply out of the money puts are widely used as a protection tools. Thus, skew can be seen as the perceived tail risk of the distribution of the market and can be a valuable indicator that shows the market sentiment toward a given underlying.

Structural Demand and Supply: The market is ‘long stock’, so investors naturally tend to sell high strike calls options (to enhance the yield of the portfolio through income) and to buy puts options in order to protect the portfolio returns.


Use of the skew:

The first thing is that there is not a single measure of equity volatility skew that is unambiguously best for all purposes. In fact, skew is dependent from volatility level, maturity, spot price. A very interesting way of expressing skew is (25 delta put volatility-25 delta call volatility) / 50 delta volatility, which emerges as the preferred skew measure based on the theoretical and empirical analysis.

Predictive power of returns: Academics tend to suggest that there is predictive information content within the volatility skew, especially in the short-term for stock market returns. However, market practitioners tend to make no money from such findings. So it seems that there is no clear empirical relationship... Sorry guys.

There have been many attempts in the academic literature to model the behavior of changes in skew, but the interpretation of skew information by traders is still done largely on a qualitative and ad hoc basis.


Trading Skew

An experienced trader explained me a rule of thumb, 10 delta difference between 2 options should roughly equate to 1 vol difference. Skew will be expensive if above 1.5 and cheap if below 0.5.

Risk Reversals, Put Spreads and Call Spreads are skew trading strategies. The main drawbacks when entering such king of strategy is that realisation of the skew will be impacted by vol level and spot level, so a decent amount of noise will come affect the trade. As the trade is done, moneyless/delta of the options is affected by the spot and/or volatility changes and passage of time.

Also, when trading short term options (less than 3m, for example) most of skew buying strategies tend to have poor gamma/theta ratios. In other words owning gamma via puts with high skews can be expensive in terms of theta decay compared to a portfolio made up of at-the-money or call options.

Monday 20 August 2012

Irrational Exuberance (Market Bubbles in Action)



Below, a graph of Real Estate Market Prices over a long time period. The index of US home prices is constructed by linking together various available series that were designed to provide an estimate of the price of a standard, unchanging, house.

When I first saw this chart, it was back in 2007, I think. So home prices did not collapsed yet. 
It was in the 2nd edition of ‘Irrational Exuberance’ by Shiller. So we were contemplating an almost vertical line for real (inflation adjusted) home prices in the US.

The main takeaways are
  • Home prices are not correlated to Building costs, Population, Interest Rates. 
  • Inflation adjusted, there is no uptrend in real home prices
  • Corrections in real estate markets occur 

As such, it is surprising to hear so many times that real estate prices always go up (land is scarce, population increases, level of prosperity increase, etc). And this is why it is interesting to look at history.

On the same note, I hear today so many people saying that finance is over. I disagree.
Reading books about history of financial markets helps understanding that things are just cyclical.


Reference:
http://www.irrationalexuberance.com/

Wednesday 15 August 2012

Game On (Tail risk in European Equities)



Today, I was wondering how much of tail risk is priced in the market at the moment. EURUSD currency pair provides one of the purest way of trading a potential Euro Zone breakup, while European stocks are my natural underlying (because of my job).

Tail risk is cheap on a 5 year relative basis in FX and damn cheap in equities.
     -       EURUSD: 6M 25D Butterfly: Currently in 24th percentile on 5Y history
     -       Eurostoxx 50:
-      6M Put Skew (90%-100%) currently in 9th percentile on 5Y history
-   6M Call Skew (100%-110%) currently in 7th percentile on 5Y history

Most of the person I talk to believe that the probability of a breakup of the euro through exit of Greece is  non-negligible. Some of them even consider as pretty much already done. So I have a hard time reconciling the idea of a Euro break up (a true tail risk event, from my view) and low implied volatility. 

Indeed, it is not very clear how a country can leave (or be forced to leave) the eurozone from a legal and practical point of view. We have a very interesting paper which won the Wolfson Prize on this topic, stating that ‘Overall, () analysis has revealed a series of very tricky issues which any exiting country would need to face” “but all of these difficulties can be overcome”.

In Summary, a country, such as Greece, contemplating leaving the euro would have to keep its plans secret until the last minute, introduce capital controls, start printing a new currency only after formal exit, implement last-minute bank holidays, seek a large depreciation (30/50%), default on its debts (note: redomination of debt may not automatically lead to default as it depends on lex monetae and contractual intentions, especially for countries that have issued debt under domestic law), recapitalise bust banks and seek close co-operation with remaining euro members. 

“Such a rebalancing of the economy away from reliance on net exports would be in the interests of the whole of the current membership of the eurozone, as well as countries outside it,” according to the paper. Nice.

Moreover, an exit also means heavy losses for debt holders as debt is likely to be re-denominated in the depreciated new currency. One-Off public costs of a euro area exit for European counterparts of Greece (from The Economist) in Eur would be 323bn:
     -       Aid package                           50bn
     -       Disbursements in bails outs    127bn
     -       Govt bonds held by ECB         40bn
     -       Target2 debt                          106bn

Talking about tail risk, I found an interesting note by Bank of America-Merrill Lynch on game theory and euro breakup risk premium published in July12. It explains that an uncooperative outcome dominates the strategies of both Germany and Greece (this is why we are stuck for the last 2 years). The paper also explains that in looking at output growth, borrowing cost, balance sheet impacts, Italy and Ireland are the two countries benefiting most from a voluntary exit of euro. Germany, despite being the most likely to leave, has the lowest incentive to do so due to negative impact on growth and loss from debt holding. So the game of Germany would be to ‘bribe’ Italy to stay.

However, the Nash equilibrium of the game would be an exit of Italy regardless of what Germany does. This sounds a bit extreme. However, I try to keep in mind that the world is much more violent than what we would like to think and outcomes much more volatile than predicted in our models.

So I do not understand why tail risk is currently priced so low, if we consider the implications of a euro break up: sorting out the uncertainties and taking the losses.

The only thing I can think about is QE and/or a weaker Euro… A recent survey of fund managers showed that 80% of fund managers see ECB doing QE in Q3/Q4. So SX5E Call Spreads are really cheap then?


References

http://www.economist.com/node/21560252

Tuesday 14 August 2012

History of World GDP


So China and India are not 'Emerging Powers'. They are just returning to power

Bloomberg Functions For Equity




Equities Function

WEI             World Equity Indices

HVG            Historical Volatility Graph
HVT            Historical Volatility Table
HCP            Historical Daily changes and Volumes
HVP M         Historical Monthly changes and Volumes
HRH            Historical returns distribution
VAP            Traded prices + VWAP for a given intraday period

DES            Company Description
HDS            Company’s Owners
FA               Company’s Financial Analysis (BS, IS, CFS)

GV              Historical IV and RV Volatility (can chose % Moneyness for IV)
GIV             Intraday implied volatility changes (fixed strike)

OV              Option Pricing (includes payoff and Greeks graphs)
OSA            Option Portfolio (from OV)
OVDV          Volatility surfaces (much better than SKEW function)
OMON          Option Monitor, linked to the exchanges
MOSO          Option Most traded across markets
OMST          Option Most traded for a given underlying
OSCH          Option research tool

CT               Contract table (useful for Futures)
FH               Futures Hedge Ratio

BI                Bloomberg Industries (overview, detailed analysis of an industry)
RV               Relative Value tool (becomes powerful with customisation tools)

G                Graph
GIP             Intraday Chart (can type GIP10)
GPC            Long Term Candle Chart
IGPV           Graph with technical studies
CIX             Advanced Graphing tool (spreads, ratios, etc)
HS              Historical Spreads with Statistical analysis
BTST           Back Testing of generic technical trading signals

READ           Most popular News
TOP             Top News
FIRS            Bloomberg First News
NI HOT        Hot Headlines

NLRT           Set up News Alert
TNI             Search tool
CN              Company News

Monday 13 August 2012

Let The Good Times Roll (European Equities and Credit)



The relationship between stock price volatility and CDS spread is statistically strong, with a historical correlation close to 0.70 in both regions.

Below, a comparison of current Volatility and Credit levels
-       Volatility is measured as V2X and VIX
-       Credit is measured as Markit Itraxx Europe and USA Generic 5Y corporate CDS (basket of 125 cds for each)
Source: Bloomberg

And the graphic representation of historical levels since 2004
Source: Bloomberg


Source: Bloomberg

Today, credit is in 80th percentile and 63rd percentile in Europe and USA, respectively while equity volatility is in the 52nd percentile and 34th percentile. In Europe, the spread is particularly large. This conflicting signal puzzles me, especially if I look at the following items (the list could be long):
-        Spain 10Y still above 6.80%, around crisis levels
-        Still potential breakup of the eurozone, with all the mess it implies
-        ESM  still not in place and no clear support for a banking license that will allow the entity to fund itself
-        ECB bond purchases seniority issue not resolved, pushing private investors down the pecking order of creditors
-        Deterioration of corporate earnings and economic indicators

From the other hand, the spread between equity volatility and credit could remain at high levels
-        The performance of equity markets is not that bad (+5.4% so far in 2012), served by relatively better yields than in the rates market and low valuation
-        The CDS index has 25% of financial companies against 22% for the Equity index, explaining part of the difference
-        Also, CDS has underperformed vs Cash, due to the lack of liquidity in the cash market and positive basis

As the answer will come from our politics, so the catalysts to look at in September are the following:
-       6th Sep : ECB Meeting :  SMP details?
-        12th Sep : Constitutional court of Karlsruhe for ESM vote
-        13th Sep: Fed meeting: QE3 or not QE3?
-        15th Sep : Euro Group meeting

What history tells us:

From Luc Laeven and Fabian Valencia, IMF : "An interesting pattern emerges: banking crises tend to start in the second half of the year, with large September and December effects."

From Roggof, Harvard: crises to happen in election years. The intuition behind is that crises are the result of imbalances that accumulate over a long time. Politicians have a strong incentive to delay dealing with them until after an election, and often, as was the case with Greece, to actually hide the truth until the polls close. We had Elections in France, and US and China leadership transition on the agenda.

Personally, I tend to think that August will probably remain quiet. 
However, I am really worried about September 12, Equity volatility should explode. 

So let’s enjoy the end of the summer while it lasts.